¨Christian opponents to same-sex marriage want the government to treat homosexuals as a special category of persons subject to discrimination, similar to the way that African-Americans and women were categorized in the past, cultural and economic critic Wendell Berry told Baptist ministers in Kentucky on January 11.¨
¨...Berry said he could recall only twice before when he commented publicly on the issue, in a single paragraph in a collection of essays published in 2005 and in an interview with the National Review in 2012.
“My argument, much abbreviated both times, was the sexual practices of consenting adults ought not to be subjected to the government’s approval or disapproval, and that domestic partnerships in which people who live together and devote their lives to one another ought to receive the spousal rights, protections and privileges the government allows to heterosexual couples,” Berry said.
Berry said
liberals and conservatives have invented “a politics of sexuality” that
establishes marriage as a “right” to be granted or withheld by whichever side
prevails. He said both viewpoints contravene principles of democracy that rights
are self-evident and inalienable and not determined and granted or withheld by
the government.
“Christians of a certain disposition have found several
ways to categorize homosexuals as different as themselves, who are in the
category of heterosexual and therefore normal and therefore good,” Berry said.
What is unclear, he said, is why they single out homosexuality as a
perversion.
“The Bible, as I pointed out to the writers of National
Review, has a lot more to say against fornication and adultery than against
homosexuality,” he said. “If one accepts the 24th and 104th Psalms as scriptural
norms, then surface mining and other forms of earth destruction are perversions.
If we take the Gospels seriously, how can we not see industrial warfare -- with
its inevitable massacre of innocents -- as a most shocking perversion? By the
standard of all scriptures, neglect of the poor, of widows and orphans, of the
sick, the homeless, the insane, is an abominable perversion.”
“Jesus talked of hating your neighbor as tantamount to hating God, and yet some Christians hate their neighbors by policy and are busy hunting biblical justifications for doing so,” he said. “Are they not perverts in the fullest and fairest sense of that term? And yet none of these offenses -- not all of them together -- has made as much political/religious noise as homosexual marriage.”
Another argument used, Berry said, is that homosexuality is “unnatural.”
“If it can be argued that homosexual marriage is not reproductive and is therefore unnatural and should be forbidden on that account, must we not argue that childless marriages are unnatural and should be annulled?” he asked.
“One may find the sexual practices of homosexuals to be unattractive or displeasing and therefore unnatural, but anything that can be done in that line by homosexuals can be done and is done by heterosexuals,” Berry continued. “Do we need a legal remedy for this? Would conservative Christians like a small government bureau to inspect, approve and certify their sexual behavior? Would they like a colorful tattoo verifying government approval on the rumps of lawfully copulating parties? We have the technology, after all, to monitor everybody’s sexual behavior, but so far as I can see so eager an interest in other people’s private intimacy is either prurient or totalitarian or both.”
“The oddest of the strategies to condemn and isolate homosexuals is to propose that homosexual marriage is opposed to and a threat to heterosexual marriage, as if the marriage market is about to be cornered and monopolized by homosexuals,” Berry said. “If this is not industrial capitalist paranoia, it at least follows the pattern of industrial capitalist competitiveness. We must destroy the competition. If somebody else wants what you’ve got, from money to marriage, you must not hesitate to use the government – small of course – to keep them from getting it.”
Berry said “so-called traditional marriage” is “for sure suffering a statistical failure, but this is not the result of a homosexual plot.”
“Heterosexual marriage does not
need defending,” Berry said. “It only needs to be practiced, which is pretty
hard to do just now.” please read it all, HERE
Thanks to End Bigotry in Venango Country, sidebar
Thanks to Wendell Berry
Thanks to Bob Allen, ABP News
No comments:
Post a Comment