Feb 9, 2010

MURDEROUS ANGLICANS ALERT: Stop the Anti-Homosexuality FEAR and HATE CAMPAIGN preached in Uganda by Bishop Orombi and his political accomplices...


¨AS ROWAN SINGS ITS PRAISES THE ANGLICAN CHURCH IN UGANDA GOES IN FOR THE KILL¨*


February 9, 2010

CHURCH OF UGANDA’S POSITION ON THE ANTI HOMOSEXUALITY BILL 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Church of Uganda associates itself with the concerns expressed in the Anti Homosexuality Bill 2009. However, instead of a completely new Bill, the Church recommends a Bill that amends the Penal Code Act (Cap.120) addressing loopholes, in particular:

· protecting the vulnerabilities of the boy child;

· proportionality in sentencing;

· and, ensuring that sexual orientation is excluded as a protected human right.

Further, we recommend involvement of all stakeholders in the preparation of such a Bill in order to uphold Uganda’s values as they relate to human sexuality.

The full statement follows:


Church of Uganda’s position on Homosexuality

The Church of Uganda derives her mandate and authority from the canonical scriptures of the Old and New Testament, as the ultimate rule and standard of faith, given by inspiration of God and containing all things necessary from salvation. Her mission is to “fulfill Christ’s mission through holistic teaching, evangelism, discipleship and healing for healthy and godly nations.”

The Church’s position on human sexuality is consistent with its basis of faith and doctrine, and has been stated very clearly over the years as reflected in various documents. (see footnotes: i, ii, iii)

From a plain reading of Scripture, from a careful reading of Scripture, and from a critical reading of Scripture, homosexual practice has no place in God’s design of creation, the continuation of the human race through procreation, or His plan of redemption.

Even natural law reveals that the very act of sexual intercourse is an experience of embracing the sexual “other”. The Church of Uganda, therefore, believes that “Homosexual practice is incompatible with Scripture” (Resolution 1.10, 1998 Lambeth Conference).


At the same time, the Church of Uganda is committed at all levels to offer counseling, healing and prayer for people with homosexual disorientation, especially in our schools and other institutions of learning. The Church is a safe place for individuals, who are confused about their sexuality or struggling with sexual brokenness, to seek help and healing.

The Objective of the Bill

The Church of Uganda appreciates the spirit of the Bill’s objective of protecting the family, especially in light of a growing propaganda to influence younger people to accept homosexuality as a legitimate way of expressing human sexuality.


We particularly appreciate the objectives of the Bill which seek to:

a) provide for marriage in Uganda as contracted only between a man and woman;

b) prohibit and penalize homosexual behavior and related practices in Uganda as they constitute a threat to the traditional family;

c) prohibit ratification of any international treaties, conventions, protocols, agreements and declarations which are contrary or inconsistent with the provisions of the Act;

d) prohibit the licensing of organizations which promote homosexuality.

The need for a Bill that amends existing legislation

We affirm the need for a Bill in light of the existing loopholes in the current legislation, specifically sections 145-148 of the Penal Code Act (Cap 120), which do not explicitly address the other issues associated with homosexual practice such as procurement, recruitment and dissemination of literature.
That notwithstanding, the ideal situation would be one where necessary amendment is made to existing legislation to also enumerate other sexual offenses such as lesbianism and bestiality. This would not require a fresh bill on homosexuality per se but rather an amendment to the existing provisions which would also change the title to something like “The Penal Code Unnatural Offenses Amendment Bill.”

Recommendation

As Parliament considers streamlining the existing legislation, we recommend that the following issues be taken into consideration:

1. Ensure that the law protects the confidentiality of medical, pastoral and counseling relationships, including those that disclose homosexual practice in accordance with the relevant professional codes of ethics.

2. Language that strengthens the existing Penal Code to protect the boy child, especially from homosexual exploitation; to prohibit lesbianism, bestiality, and other sexual perversions; and to prohibit procurement of material and promotion of homosexuality as normal or as an alternative lifestyle, be adopted.

3. Ensure that homosexual practice or the promotion of homosexual relations is not adopted as a human right.

4. Existing and future Educational materials and programs on gender identity and sex education are in compliance with the values and the laws of Uganda.

5. The involvement of additional stakeholders in the evaluation of the gaps in the existing legislation, including, but not limited to, the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Education, and the Ministry of Internal Affairs, its Department of Immigration and other relevant departments.

6. The undertaking of a comprehensive legislative and literature review of all the laws and literature related to the subject at hand in order to identify the actual gaps in the existing legislation.
Conclusion

As a Church, we affirm the necessity of appropriate amendments within the existing legislation and corresponding Penal Code sections. The Church of Uganda, being a part of the Anglican Communion, reiterates her position on human sexuality and her desire to uphold the pastoral position of providing love and care for all God’s people caught up in any sin and remaining consistent with Holy Scriptures of the Christian Church.

The Most Rev. Henry Luke Orombi
Archbishop of the Anglican Church of the Province of Uganda
Bishop of Kampala Diocese

Notes:
i Resolution 1.10 of the Lambeth Conference of Bishops [Anglican Communion] held in 1998
ii The Church of Uganda’s Position Paper on Scripture, Authority and Human Sexuality May 2005
iii Press Statement of February 21, 2007 by Archbishop Henry Luke Orombi on the Primates’ Meeting held in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania


Lionel Deimel, click HERE,¨No Anglican Covenant¨

´The Windsor Report,´ he said. “It’s just a report. When did it become like The Bible?

´The Covenant´ ¨Why do we need another covenant? We have the Baptismal Covenant. We have the creeds. What else do we need?”


Archbishop Martin Barahona, the Primate, Iglesia Anglicana de la Region Central America


·Thanks to *Mad Priest, sidebar (Rowan=Archbishop of Canterbury)
·Thanks to *Of Course, I Could Be Wrong, sidebar
·Thanks to Flickr Photo Sharing
·Thanks to Juan Carlos C.F, Volcano Photo
·Thanks to Lionel Deimel, sidebar
·Thanks to Archbishop Martin Barahona, Primate, Central America

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

UPDATE;


¨I remember Bishop Kauma because of the debate over gays in Uganda. Not the debate itself, I think that should go on, but the fact that the most extreme views, the fellows who want to hang gays and to condemn them to life sentences, are Born-Again politicians and pastors.

Even stranger, is to hear some of these people pleading that witchdoctors who sacrifice children should be treated leniently. It is truly a strange God that approves of witchcraft and child sacrifice, but abhors homosexuality.

I asked myself, what would Bishop Kauma have done and said?
The best guide to what the good bishop might have done can be gleaned from how he dealt with Aids. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, this country was in the deadly grip of Aids and thousands were being felled by the pandemic every month. There were more juju theories and ignorant scare stories about HIV/Aids, than good science.

Superstition and irrational fear had run amok. People crossed to the other side of the street if they saw someone who was living with HIV/Aids approaching. You would go to an Aids ward to see a friend who had come down with the disease, and nurses were too frightened. They would hand the relatives the medicine to administer to the Aids patient. It was not uncommon for families to wait for darkness, then carry out a relative who was sick with the disease and throw him or her out on the roadside.¨

http://www.monitor.co.ug/OpEd/OpEdColumnists/-/689366/858880/-/3xakedz/-/index.htm

Leonardo Ricardo (Blog not working this A.M.)

Anonymous said...

This is what happens when the church and state do not remain separate!
Thank you for your updates. It's a shame mainstream media doesn't run with this and inform the world of the evangelicals role in this situation.